Credits

Professor X - Retraction
It has come to our attention that the individual known as Professor X, featured in a recent article in our magazine, is an imposter. This individual, whose real name is Riccardo Arthur De Wet, is currently on the run from authorities after fleeing the country. When he returns, he will face charges of fraud and theft.

Riccardo De Wet falsely claimed ownership and invention of the Resonance Technology promoted in our magazine through advertorials for his companies, Raversus and RadBio Technologies. He misled the public, stating that the technology—which includes resonance chambers, bio-disks, and other products—was his own creation, using these claims to solicit substantial investments from unsuspecting individuals and organisations.

We now understand that the technology in question does not belong to De Wet. The inventor is Anton Ungerer, who developed resonance technology years prior. De Wet merely leased the technology from Ungerer but fraudulently presented himself as its creator to legitimise his business and financial schemes.

We deeply and sincerely regret that our platform was used to validate and promote these deceptive claims, and we extend our most heartfelt apologies to our readers and anyone who may have been affected by this scam. We are fully cooperating with authorities in their ongoing investigation and strongly encourage anyone impacted to come forward.

Riccardo Arthur De Wet, also known as Professor X, will face charges upon his return to the country. The charges include fraud, theft, and gross misrepresentation.

We are unwavering in our commitment to ensuring that our publication upholds the highest standards of integrity. We assure you that such a situation will not occur again.

Despite the constant care and attention to the content of the publication and the information it contains, we cannot guarantee the completeness, accuracy of the data of the content and opinions expressed herein. While the publishers make every effort to ensure unbiased, well researched copy, we accept no liability for any direct or indirect damage of any kind whatsoever that arises from, or is in any way related to the use of the publication.

The assertions and opinions expressed in the articles and announcements herein reflect the views of the author(s) and do not (necessarily) reflect the views of the publisher or the collective industry. Furthermore, those involved in the production of this product can in no way whatsoever be held responsible for the content of such views nor can it be held liable for any direct or indirect damage that may arise from such views. We guarantee that the information herein is suitable for the purpose of which you consult it. All information, products and services are offered in the condition in which they actually are and Rolling Stoner magazine neither guarantees nor supports any product or service mentioned in this publication, nor does it warrant any assertions made by the manufacturers of such products. We reserve the right to make any changes with immediate effect and without providing any notice thereof.